FREE Article Preview
     Buy Complete Document
Judge Strikes Down Parts of Executive Order on Terrorism
[FINAL Edition]
The Washington Post - Washington, D.C.
Subjects: Federal court decisions; Financial aid; Constitutional law; Terrorism
Author: Dan Eggen - Washington Post Staff Writer
Date: Nov 29, 2006
Start Page: A.12
Section: A SECTION

U.S. District Judge Audrey B. Collins, in a ruling released late Monday, found that two provisions of an executive order signed Sept. 23, 2001, are impermissibly vague because they allow the president to unilaterally designate organizations as terrorist groups and broadly prohibit association with such groups.

The ruling marks a victory for the Humanitarian Law Project and other plaintiffs in the case, who are seeking to provide support for the "lawful, nonviolent activities" of two groups designated terrorist organizations by the U.S. government: the Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK) in Turkey and the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE), also known as the Tamil Tigers, in Sri Lanka.

In her ruling, Collins said the order is unconstitutional because there is "no apparent limit" on presidential authority to designate groups or individuals as terrorists. In addition, the judge ruled, language banning those "otherwise associated" with such groups is "unconstitutionally vague on its face." Collins rejected a number of other claims by the plaintiffs, however, including that the order's definition of a terrorist group is too vague.

     Buy Complete Document

Ads by Google

Most Viewed Articles  (Updated Daily)