Document
Basic Advanced Saved Page Prints Help
 Buy Complete Document:   AbstractAbstract  Full Text Full Text 
A Basic Benefit or a `Luxury'? Series: Operation Health Care. Remedies
[NASSAU AND SUFFOLK Edition]
Newsday - Long Island, N.Y.
Author: BY DENA BUNIS. STAFF WRITER
Date: Apr 18, 1993
Start Page: 48
Section: NEWS
Text Word Count: 786
 Abstract (Document Summary)

Hawaii's coverage of in-vitro has been a lightning rod for small business owners who deride the state's law requiring companies to provide health insurance. In-vitro is an expensive technique used by infertile couples to have a baby. Small business leaders in Hawaii single out that benefit as an example of the excesses and rigidity of Hawaii's plan. "It's a shrine to the effective lobbying of the single in-vitro laboratory in the state of Hawaii," says Sam Slom, head of Small Business Hawaii, an association with 3,000 members. Slom objects to a standard benefit package, he says, because it prevents businesses from tailoring benefits to the needs of a particular work force. "For example, a young, single person is not too interested either in in-vitro fertilization or in well-baby care but they might want some other kind of option. We can't do that; we can't pick and choose."

 Buy Complete Document:   Abstract Abstract  Full Text Full Text 

Most Viewed Articles  (Updated Daily)