ARCHIVES Search | Login | Search Tips | FAQ | Pricing | About the Archive | Terms
ProQuest is no longer the archive provider for Los Angeles Times. Please visit their web site to view their new archive. If you have previously purchased articles, you may log in to view them. If you have an active article plan, you may log in and continue to use it.
Document
Search
Saved
Saved
Help
Start a New Search
Buy Complete Document: AbstractAbstract Full Text Full Text
Commentary; Courts Put a Dent in Bush's 'Say-So' Detentions; When it comes to post-9/11 jailing without charges, the president is not a king.
[HOME EDITION]
Los Angeles Times - Los Angeles, Calif.
Author: Cole, David
Date: Dec 25, 2003
Start Page: B.13
Section: California Metro; Part B; Editorial Pages Desk
Abstract (Document Summary)

Citing these abuses, Congress in 1971 prohibited such detentions, providing that "no citizen shall be imprisoned or otherwise detained by the United States except pursuant to an act of Congress." The U.S. 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals relied on that statute last week in ruling that Jose Padilla, a U.S. citizen arrested at Chicago's O'Hare Airport, could not be detained on nothing more than the president's say-so.

Few of the detainees, either in the U.S. or at Guantanamo, have been American citizens. But as illustrated by the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals' simultaneous decision extending judicial review to foreign nationals at Guantanamo, skepticism about unilateral executive detention ought not to be limited to U.S. citizens.

Detaining the enemy on the battlefield has of course always been - - and remains -- a legitimate tool of war. Neither the 2nd nor the 9th Circuit ruled to the contrary. But they both insisted that preventive detention under U.S. jurisdiction must be subject to the rule of law. And the rule of law, like liberty itself, is not a right reserved for U.S. citizens.

Buy Complete Document: AbstractAbstract Full Text Full Text

Most Viewed Articles  (Updated Daily)