ARCHIVES Search | Login | Search Tips | FAQ | Pricing | About the Archive | Terms
Document
Search
Saved
Saved
Help
Start a New Search
Buy Complete Document: AbstractAbstract Full Text Full Text
ART; Curse, Legacy or Both?; Ingres chronicled an era with his luminous portraits of the rising bourgeoisie, but he didn't exactly relish the thought.
[Home Edition]
Los Angeles Times - Los Angeles, Calif.
Subjects: Art exhibits
Author: Meisler, Stanley
Date: May 30, 1999
Start Page: 6
Section: Calendar; PART-; Calendar Desk
Abstract (Document Summary)

Jean-Auguste-Dominique Ingres, the classical French master of the 19th century, professed to abhor the painting of portraits. "I cannot stand them anymore," he wrote a friend in 1841. "It is not to paint portraits that I returned to Paris." "Cursed portraits!" he wrote another friend six years later. "They always prevent me from undertaking important things. . . ."

The ambitious undertaking stemmed from a modest proposal. Ingres painted two portraits, one seated, one standing, of Madame Ines Moitessier, a buxom woman whom Ingres called "the beautiful and the good." The standing, somewhat austere Madame Moitessier now belongs to Washington's National Gallery; the seated, more appealing Madame Moitessier to London's National Gallery.

Scholars still prize the large paintings, and the public is still titillated by his erotic scenes of nudes in Turkish harems. But the subjects of most Ingres murals are too obscure for most modern viewers. The reputation of Ingres now rests mainly on his cursed portraits.

Buy Complete Document: AbstractAbstract Full Text Full Text

Most Viewed Articles  (Updated Daily)