Document
Search Saved Saved Saved Help
Start a New Search
 Buy Complete Document:   Abstract Abstract  Full Text Full Text  Buy Page Print Page Print
Witnesses Challenge Lisker Evidence; An expert testifies that a shoeprint at the scene was not the defendant's. A drug counselor says he once heard the teenager threaten his mother.
[HOME EDITION]
Los Angeles Times - Los Angeles, Calif.
Subjects: Court hearings & proceedings, Expert witness testimony, Murders & murder attempts
Author: Matt Lait and Scott Glover
Date: Dec 7, 2005
Start Page: B.1
Section: California Metro; Part B; Metro Desk
Text Word Count: 960
 Abstract (Document Summary)

At [Bruce Lisker]'s trial, the prosecutor argued that only Lisker's bloody shoeprints were found at the crime scene. Sandra Wiersema, an FBI analyst, disputed that claim, testifying that a bloody print in a bathroom at the Lisker residence did not match Lisker's shoes.

During Lisker's trial, prosecutor Phillip Rabichow said that Lisker could not possibly have seen his mother's body laying on the floor near the front entryway through a dining room window in the backyard, as he told police.

[James Zeilan] said Lisker also directed his anger at him, after he told Lisker to leave a meeting because Zeilan believed Lisker was on drugs.

Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction or distribution is prohibited without permission.
 Buy Complete Document:   Abstract Abstract  Full Text Full Text  Buy Page Print Page Print

Most Viewed Articles  (Updated Daily)