Globe Subscribers For free access to the archives, log in here.

Over the next several weeks, The Boston Globe will be moving its archive search to a new provider as ProQuest ends its consumer archiver product. We think you'll like our new archive search features, and thanks so much for your support of the Globe!
Start a New Search
Buy Complete Document: AbstractAbstract Full Text Full Text
[THIRD Edition]
Boston Globe - Boston, Mass.
Subjects: Racism; Journalistic ethics
Author: Alex Beam Globe Staff
Date: Jan 14, 2005
Start Page: F.1
Section: Business
Abstract (Document Summary)

Early in 2004, a friend of mine who had been a top Metro USA executive sought me out to publish a sensational story about Metro. We met. The story, now widely known, was indeed sensational, and horrible. He said that two top Metro officials, Steve Nylund and Hans Holger-Albrecht, had used the "n-word" in front of large audiences at Metro functions overseas, one of which he had attended. My source refused to be identified in the story but promised to put me in touch with other Metro staffers who would confirm the events.

Now I had to make a choice. I had one staffer confirming the racist remarks on the record, and a strong denial from Nylund. None of the parties involved could produce a tape or transcript of the meetings in question. I repeatedly asked my original source, and his colleague, to put their remarks on the record. I felt that their intention was to use the prestige of the Globe to harm their former employer, and end the two executives' careers there. My two anonymous sources were making charges that amounted to "blood libel" against former colleagues; that raised the bar for ethical publication. I had to confront Nylund with his remarks. Why hadn't they? Why hadn't they objected to the racist slurs while they were working inside Metro?

Buy Complete Document: AbstractAbstract Full Text Full Text

Most Viewed Articles  (Updated Daily)

Search | Saved Search | Login | Tips | FAQ | Pricing | Account | Help | About | Terms