|
Buy Complete Document:
|
|
| Loved, hated, center's profile was towering | |
| [FINAL Edition] | |
| The Sun - Baltimore, Md. | |
| Author: | ARTHUR HIRSCH |
| Date: | Sep 12, 2001 |
| Start Page: | 2.A |
| Section: | TELEGRAPH |
| Text Word Count: | 680 |
| Abstract (Document Summary) | |
|
One could always argue about whether the buildings were the tallest in the world - without their broadcasting antennas they were not; with the antennas they were - but it seemed beyond dispute that the 110-story towers together loomed largest in the psyche of New York. Who, after all, can form a mental image of the world's tallest building, the Petronas Towers in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia? The twin towers were not beautiful, or poetic. They had not the art deco grace of Manhattan's Empire State Building nor the Chrysler Building. The towers were sheer power expressed in steel, concrete, aluminum and glass, bearing in their staggering ascension a certain arrogance, too. From the beginning, the towers were considered an unfortunate example of urban renewal, an unsightly answer to the question of how to improve conditions in a shabby section of lower Manhattan. Sixteen acres of neighborhood were sacrificed to the project. According to the Times, the towers disrupted flight patterns of birds, which crashed into the towers by the dozens and fell dead to the pavement.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction or distribution is prohibited without permission.
|
|
|
Buy Complete Document:
|
|
• FBI's use of bloodhounds in anthrax probe disputed ; Techniques: The three California handlers bro...
• Alchemy gets new respect in science ; Scholars find roots in arcane practices
• SOME SAY BLOCH SHOULD BE CAREFUL
• Loved, hated, center's profile was towering
All articles © The Baltimore Sun and may not be republished, copied or distributed without permission.
If you have questions or comments about the archives, please send us feedback
