Document
Advanced Saved Page Prints Help
 Buy Complete Document:   Abstract Abstract  Full TextFull Text
Loved, hated, center's profile was towering
[FINAL Edition]
The Sun - Baltimore, Md.
Author: ARTHUR HIRSCH
Date: Sep 12, 2001
Start Page: 2.A
Section: TELEGRAPH
Text Word Count: 680
 Abstract (Document Summary)

One could always argue about whether the buildings were the tallest in the world - without their broadcasting antennas they were not; with the antennas they were - but it seemed beyond dispute that the 110-story towers together loomed largest in the psyche of New York. Who, after all, can form a mental image of the world's tallest building, the Petronas Towers in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia?

The twin towers were not beautiful, or poetic. They had not the art deco grace of Manhattan's Empire State Building nor the Chrysler Building. The towers were sheer power expressed in steel, concrete, aluminum and glass, bearing in their staggering ascension a certain arrogance, too.

From the beginning, the towers were considered an unfortunate example of urban renewal, an unsightly answer to the question of how to improve conditions in a shabby section of lower Manhattan. Sixteen acres of neighborhood were sacrificed to the project. According to the Times, the towers disrupted flight patterns of birds, which crashed into the towers by the dozens and fell dead to the pavement.

 Buy Complete Document:   AbstractAbstract  Full Text Full Text 

Most Viewed Articles  (Updated Daily)



All articles © The Baltimore Sun and may not be republished, copied or distributed without permission.

If you have questions or comments about the archives, please send us feedback